Who decides for Sierra Leone? The ICSID, ICC, or the People of Lunsar?
According to Global Arbitration Review, a business law website, the subsidiary had "been accused of inciting a deadly riot before the case was dropped without charge."
In October 2019, a subsidiary of a London-based commodity trader applied to a court in the United States of America to confirm an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) emergency arbitrator order that directedSierra Leone to lift measures prohibiting the export of high-grade iron ore – a dispute that has also given rise to the threat of an ICSID claim.
ICC is the institutional representative of more than 45 million companies in over 100 countries. According to their website, their "mission is to make business work for everyone, every day, everywhere."
Back in February, an ICC tribunal reportedly issued a peremptory order requiring Sierra Leone to reinstate an iron-ore mining licence and lift export restrictions within eight days – in a dispute that has also given rise to the west African state’s first ICSID claim.
ICSID is touted as the world’s leading institution devoted to international investment dispute settlement. It is said to have extensive experience in this field, having administered the majority of all international investment cases. States have agreed on ICSID as a forum for investor-State dispute settlement in most international investment treaties and in numerous investment laws and contracts.
Photo courtesy of Speak Media "Lunsar Cycling Team: helping young people in Sierra Leone"